Categories
Population

Drought

There isn’t a shortage of water so much as a longage of people

                                                            Paraphrasing Garrett Hardin

Drought in Texas

            This morning I cut down a little piñon tree. It had died during the winter, and was unsightly this spring with dead needles clinging to its branches. It had looked stressed last summer so I had watered it 2 or 3 times, as in previous summers. I guess it was given too little water, too late. This little tree was victim of our megadrought.

            There was media coverage when a scientific paper on North American drought was published. Regrettably, the media lost interest in the subject which will affect so many lives. The paper’s title wasn’t prepossessing: “Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought”. Its two main points were correct, unfortunately. The North American megadrought has emerged. A megadrought is defined by its duration—it must last 20 years or longer. When the paper was written, the drought wasn’t quite that old. An update was published two years later, confirming the concerns of the original paper.

            The megadrought started at the turn of millennium, and is still with us as of June, 2024. All of La Plata County, Colorado, is experiencing moderate drought.

The second key point of the paper is that “anthropogenic warming” is a major cause of our drought. Yes, we humans are responsible for almost half of the dryness. These two papers calculate that more than 40% of our megadrought is human caused, due to global heating.

            Both articles used tree-ring data to estimate prehistoric rainfall. Since trees grow faster when there is adequate precipitation, this is a valid method to use before records were kept. There are tree-ring data for SW North America that go back 1200 years. The second paper states that the current megadrought is the worst in that whole 1200-year stretch!

            Drought isn’t confined to the USA. Mexican farmers faced crop failures caused by a heat dome affecting most of the country. Canada is also suffering. There are areas of extreme drought in the Canadian west where terrible wildfires are burning.

            The drought can cause a positive feedback loop with harmful results. Drying of bodies of water, such as the Great Salt Lake, exposes dry earth. Spring winds blow the dark dust onto white snow, causing it to melt sooner. This can cause deluges of early snowmelt and produce flooding—too much water at the wrong time—that doesn’t contribute to groundwater.

            How serious is this megadrought? We will see more communities like Rio Verde Foothills, Arizona, where residents have practically no water source. In 2022 Severance, Colorado, realized that its water was already serving the maximum number of people and had to stop issuing building permits. Using foresight, last year Arizona stopped issuing building permits in some areas around Phoenix due to lack of water.

          What can we do about the megadrought? Of course, most important is being careful with the water we have. In addition, we need to limit our carbon emissions, because our use of fossil fuels is what is causing the increase in drought. To quote the first megadrought paper: “The magnitude of future droughts in North America and elsewhere will depend greatly on future rates of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions globally.”

          One of the goals of the local organization, 4CORE (Four Corners Office for Resource Efficiency), is to reduce local carbon emissions. Their programs include making homes more energy efficient, encouraging use of rain barrels to harvest precipitation, and electrification of homes and transportation. Most of all, we must recognize that arid land cannot support many people.

©Richard Grossman MD, 2024

Categories
Population

Childfree

           We were listening to Ann Patchett’s book of essays “These Precious Days” when “There are no children here” started. It is a remarkable essay in 23 parts, explaining why Patchett is not a mother.

            One of the micro-essays upset me a bit. Patchett met a woman who had always known that she didn’t want children. The new friend said that it took her two years to find a doctor who would do her tubal ligation.

            At age 37, Patchett decided she wanted a tubal ligation. She told her fiancé, a physician, and he told her “no”; she was doing well on birth control pills, and there is risk to surgery. She asked her gynecologist for a tubal and she also said “no”; the pill has benefits that help women. If Patchett had her tubes tied, there was a big chance that she’d go back on the pill in order to have milder periods.

            I disagree with what her fiancé and doctor advised. The failure rate of the pill is higher than that of a tubal ligation, and (despite its safety), the risk of blood clots from the pill increases rapidly as women age.

            I like what her friend said, referring to doctors who refused to do tubal ligations: “They think we don’t know our own mind when we decide to have an abortion, but we also don’t know our own mind when we decide to put ourselves in a position where we’ll never have to have an abortion.” Patchett wrote that the doctors who refused to do tubal ligations on request, considered women to be fools who couldn’t be trusted.

            Common parlance distinguishes between women who want a child but are infertile, and those who are “childfree” by choice. The latter group has always existed, but is becoming more common now. Some of these women are so focused on their work that they don’t have the time or energy to parent. Others feel that they would not be good mothers. In addition, there is a new group—women who are concerned that the future is to bleak to subject a child to climate chaos, as well as those who realize that adding to the population will worsen the future of the planet.

            There are women who did not have children—voluntarily or not—throughout history. Roman Catholic nuns take a vow of chastity. One well-known group were the Vestal Virgins, priestesses of the Roman goddess Vesta. They were chosen before puberty and could retire—and even marry—after 30 years. However, if one were caught breaking her vow of chastity, she would be executed.

            The latest figures I could find show that about one in 6 women in the USA never gave birth. Of course, that could be either for reason of infertility or voluntary childlessness.

In most societies women experience pressure to get married and then have children. Although pressure for marriage seems to have decreased, women are still expected to have babies. Pronatalism is causing humans to reproduce at an untenable rate, thus increasing overpopulation and environmental damage.

            There are many organizations for people who are considering being childfree, or have already made that decision. “The Notmom” (www.thenotmom.com) is unique because it supports women whether they are childless “by choice or by chance”. One nonprofit provides funding for sterilizations for both men and women. ChildFree by Choice (www.childfreebc.com) uses donations to help people of all genders avoid unplanned pregnancies.

            If you would like to know more about pronatalism, I suggest Nandita Bajaj’s article: www.populationbalance.org/pronatalism. Recently she was recognized as an expert in the field by coauthoring an article in the preeminent journal, Science Progress: “World scientists’ warning: The behavioural crisis driving ecological overshoot”.

            We live in an era where it is possible to have a loving, heterosexual relationship without fear of an unintended pregnancy. Now there are global as well as personal reasons to be childfree.

© Richard Grossman MD, 2024