Categories
Contraception Durango Herald Family Planning Medical Women's Issues

Wear the Implanon Contraceptive Implant

Did you know that a new contraceptive just became available in Durango? Implanon was approved for use in this country over two years ago, but its manufacturer has been very cautious in making it available.

Almost all women can safely use Implanon. It is effective for up to three years, and can be removed easily when the user wants. Best of all, once it is in place, it requires no action on the woman’s part to provide essentially perfect protection against pregnancy. Compliance is not a problem with this contraceptive method.

The availability of effective contraceptive methods is one of the three most important factors in helping to lower fertility rates in poor countries. (The other two factors are education of girls and lowering child mortality rates. Thanks to almost universal literacy and modern pediatric care in our country, we don’t have to worry about these two factors.) The sad fact is that half of pregnancies conceived in the United States are unplanned. Can a method that is reliable and simple to use help lower this statistic?

Implanon is similar to Norplant in some ways, but has significant differences. You may remember that Norplant consisted of six flexible plastic rods filled with a hormone. Although it was initially well received, a problem forced it off the market a number of years ago.
Many women were keen on Norplant, but doctors weren’t. It had to be inserted properly, so each of the rods was right under the skin of the woman’s arm. Norplant was difficult to remove if it were placed too deep. Bad insertion technique is what got Norplant into trouble. Too many were inserted by people who weren’t properly trained, so doctors attempted removal and ran into difficulties.

The similarities between Implanon and Norplant include the hormonal makeup, which has no estrogen. Both Norplant and Implanon just use a progestin, making them safe—especially for women with blood clotting disorders or migraine headaches. Both systems cause menstrual irregularity; most women using them either have irregular menstrual bleeding. Both offer very reliable contraception, with failure rates of just a fraction of a percent. Both have the hormone in one or more flexible plastic rods that are implanted under the skin of a woman’s arm. Implanon has only one rod, which makes insertion and removal much easier than Norplant’s six.

Learning from the Norplant fiasco, the manufacturer of Implanon has taken precautions to prevent it from getting misused. Implanon will only be available to doctors (and other medical providers) who have completed a comprehensive training program. I attended such a program in Durango in August with a dozen other providers. After practicing the technique on plastic models, we were all impressed with how easy Implanon is to insert and remove. In real people insertion or removal is done with a bit of local anesthesia and takes just a minute or two.

How do women like Implanon? According to the manufacturer, women like it very much. They advised us, however, to warn women before getting this contraceptive method that it will mess up their menstrual cycles. Almost all women will have some spotting or irregular bleeding with Implanon. After a period of adjustment, however, some women will stop bleeding entirely. Skipping periods is entirely safe. Fewer periods helps prevent anemia and PMS, and is the goal of some new birth control pill formulations.

An Implanon wearer should not be aware of its presence. The implant is placed under the skin of a woman’s upper arm. The rod is small and flexible, so an observer cannot see it hidden below her skin. A health care provider (or the woman herself) can find it easily by touching in the correct place.
Implanon works in two different ways. Most important is that the hormone stops ovulation. Without an egg, pregnancy cannot begin. An additional action is that the hormone makes cervical mucus impenetrable to sperm. These two actions make it very reliable, with only one failure per year per thousand women using it.

When a woman wishes to conceive, her fertility should return quickly after Implanon is taken out. Likewise, if a woman doesn’t like the method (for instance, if the irregular bleeding gets to her), the side effects are rapidly reversed as soon as it is removed.

Implanon might not be the contraceptive answer for all couples, but it provides another method that will be safe and effective for some. I am glad that we can now offer it in Durango!

© Richard Grossman MD, 2007

[The article above may be copied or published but must remain intact, with attribution to the author. I also request that the words “First published in the Durango Herald” accompany any publication. For more information, please write the author at: richard@population-matters.org.]

Categories
Durango Herald Family Planning Public Health Women's Issues

Envision the Ideal Baby Food

Imagine a food that is ideal nutritionally, is inexpensive and prevents many diseases. Wouldn’t you expect such a product to be used universally? Guess again!

Breast milk is all of the above, and more. Sadly, only one child in seven born in the USA is given just breast milk at six months of age, which is what the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends. It is especially sad that one third of all moms never give their babies access to the best possible food.

I had the chance to visit an obstetrical clinic in Egypt. I asked one of the new mothers if she was nursing her baby. “Oh, yes, we all breastfeed for seven months!” she exclaimed. “That is what the Qur’an says we must do. Many women continue to nurse longer.”

Why don’t mothers in the USA nurse their children, since it is best for themselves and their babies? Many forces act against breastfeeding. Manufacturers market artificial formula intensely to pregnant women and new mothers. When you go down the aisles of a supermarket you see all sorts of formulas and bottles, but little or nothing for breastfeeding. Of course, one of the advantages of breastfeeding is that the new mother doesn’t need to buy anything.

Let’s face it; our society is unfriendly for breastfeeding moms. Many new mothers need to return to work six weeks or less after giving birth. Few workplaces have provision for women to pump their breasts, let alone for the baby to be nearby so he can nurse. Until society becomes nursing-friendly, many babies can only get six weeks of this ideal food. Fortunately, the first month of nursing is the most important.

Another reason that women are turning away from breastfeeding is that we view breasts as sex objects. Recently a former Durango woman was thrown off an airplane in Vermont for breastfeeding. Even though she was nursing discretely, the flight attendant insisted that she cover her nursing baby with a blanket.

Breast milk has advantages for both baby and mother. The breastfed baby is less likely to get sick from diarrhea or respiratory diseases because he receives immunity from his mother. He is less susceptible to allergic problems such as asthma and eczema. Recent research suggests that he will even be slightly more intelligent than if he had bottle-fed. Nursing lessens his chances of getting serious diseases such as diabetes, lymphoma, certain bowel diseases and one type of arthritis. He is less likely to die of sudden infant death syndrome. Finally, his chances of obesity are much less if he nurses.

A healthy baby is wonderful here, but critical in poorer countries where five million children die of infectious diseases annually. Couples will not choose to have smaller families until they can be relatively sure that their children will live until adulthood. Paradoxically, survival of children is important for slowing population growth.

Advantages to the mom are also significant. Breastfeeding diminishes her risk of anemia since nursing decreases postpartum blood loss. Women who have breastfed their babies are less likely to develop breast, ovarian and uterine cancers. Losing “baby fat” is easier for a nursing woman, making obesity less likely.

The psychological advantages of breastfeeding are very significant. Breastfeeding promotes intimacy between mother and infant. This is partly because the baby’s suckling releases oxytocin, the “hormone of love.” Oxytocin helps bond the mother to her baby.

Other hormonal effects of nursing are also important. Another hormone, prolactin, stimulates the breasts to make milk. It also allows the new mother’s ovaries to rest, making her much less fertile while nursing. This natural family planning has helped to regulate fertility for millennia. Worldwide, breastfeeding is the most widely used temporary contraceptive method.

This relative infertility has been studied extensively and found to rival the effectiveness of modern contraceptive methods. Named LAM (for Lactational Amenorrhea Method), it is 98 % effective if the mom meets three requirements. The baby must be breastfed almost exclusively, be less than six months old, and the mother must not have resumed menstruation.

Breastfeeding is good for the environment, too. There are no cans or bottles to dispose of, and fossil fuels are not needed to ship artificial formula long distances. No methane-emitting cows need be milked as to make artificial formulas.

For years I have said that inferior products have supplanted two superior ones—drinking water and breast milk. Now industry is marketing water extensively. I hope that breast milk will regain its rightful place in human nutrition.

© Richard Grossman MD, 2007

[The article above may be copied or published but must remain intact, with attribution to the author. I also request that the words “First published in the Durango Herald” accompany any publication. For more information, please write the author at: richard@population-matters.org.]